Home › Aircraft › Wide-Body Aircraft Guide
Wide-Body Aircraft Guide
All wide-body jets in Tailwinds compared: seats, range, lease cost, fuel burn, and per-seat economics. Pick the right twin-aisle for long-haul expansion.
Widebodies are how a Tailwinds airline goes intercontinental — and how plenty of them go bankrupt. A twin-aisle jet carries two to three times the passengers of a narrow-body, costs several times as much to lease, and burns fuel accordingly. On a dense long-haul trunk route it prints money; on a thin route it is the fastest way to destroy a healthy balance sheet.
Fill rate is everything at this scale. A 300-seat jet at 85% load is a triumph; the same jet at 45% is a weekly six-figure loss. Before leasing any aircraft on this page, be confident the city pair can actually fill it — big populations at both ends, ideally with hub feed behind one of them.
How to choose
Modern twins (the 777X, A330neo, 787 and A350 families, plus the 777-300ER) fill the top of the efficiency table and should be your default for new long-haul flying. Older types — A340s, early 777s, the 767 family — lease for dramatically less and remain sensible on routes you have already proven, or as a bridge while you build cash. They arrive second-hand, though, so budget for maintenance well above the base figure. Watch range carefully: ultra-long-range variants carry a lease premium you only earn back on routes that actually need it. Every range here is quoted at the maker's typical cabin. Pack a widebody to its exit limit and the extra passengers come out of the fuel, so the range falls, sharply on the ultra-long-range A350s, whose headline needs a light premium cabin like Singapore's or Qantas'.
All 31 aircraft at a glance
Figures are the game's actual values. Fuel cost assumes the base fuel price of $1.45/litre — the live market price in your save drifts between roughly half and nearly double that, which is why fuel hedging matters. Lease and price are the classic-game market rates. Any type whose production line closed in 1976 or earlier is buy-only, because no lessor stocks it, so ignore its lease column. In an era game the calendar takes over: a type appears the year it entered service, lessors only take it from ten years after that (the war-surplus C-46, C-47 and DC-4 excepted), and prices shift with the year.
| Aircraft | Seats | Range | Cruise | Lease/wk | Price | Fuel/100km | Fuel/seat-km | Fuel rank | Lease/seat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airbus A310-300 | 280 | 9,600 km at 240 seats (8,900 km at 280) | 870 km/h | $43K | $18M | 746 L | 3.86¢ | 25 / 31 | $154 |
| Airbus A310-200 | 280 | 6,800 km at 240 seats (6,200 km at 280) | 870 km/h | $36K | $15M | 798 L | 4.13¢ | 28 / 31 | $129 |
| Boeing 767-200ER | 290 | 12,200 km at 181 seats (10,000 km at 290) | 870 km/h | $40K | $16M | 627 L | 3.14¢ | 21 / 31 | $138 |
| Ilyushin Il-96-300 | 300 | 11,000 km at 262 seats (10,600 km at 300) | 870 km/h | $65K | $30M | 1150 L | 5.56¢ | 30 / 31 | $217 |
| Airbus A300B4 | 345 | 5,400 km at 250 seats (4,100 km at 345) | 870 km/h | $38K | $16M | 947 L | 3.98¢ | 26 / 31 | $110 |
| Ilyushin Il-86 | 350 | 5,000 km at 300 seats (4,600 km at 350) | 870 km/h | $40K | $20M | 1395 L | 5.78¢ | 31 / 31 | $114 |
| Boeing 767-300ER | 351 | 11,090 km at 218 seats (8,700 km at 351) | 870 km/h | $68K | $28M | 703 L | 2.90¢ | 19 / 31 | $194 |
| Airbus A300-600R | 361 | 7,700 km at 266 seats (6,300 km at 361) | 870 km/h | $58K | $24M | 865 L | 3.47¢ | 22 / 31 | $161 |
| Boeing 767-400ER | 375 | 10,415 km at 245 seats (8,100 km at 375) | 870 km/h | $87K | $36M | 710 L | 2.75¢ | 16 / 31 | $232 |
| Douglas DC-10-30 | 380 | 9,700 km at 270 seats (8,700 km at 380) | 870 km/h | $43K | $22M | 1319 L | 5.03¢ | 29 / 31 | $113 |
| Boeing 787-8 | 381 | 13,620 km at 242 seats (11,000 km at 381) | 870 km/h | $296K | $135M | 674 L | 2.57¢ | 9 / 31 | $777 |
| Lockheed L-1011 TriStar | 400 | 6,670 km at 256 seats (5,100 km at 400) | 870 km/h | $35K | $18M | 1117 L | 4.05¢ | 27 / 31 | $88 |
| Airbus A330-200 | 406 | 13,400 km at 247 seats (10,700 km at 406) | 870 km/h | $134K | $55M | 746 L | 2.66¢ | 12 / 31 | $330 |
| Airbus A330-800neo | 406 | 15,100 km at 240 seats (12,100 km at 406) | 870 km/h | $231K | $95M | 690 L | 2.46¢ | 3 / 31 | $569 |
| McDonnell Douglas MD-11 | 410 | 12,455 km at 298 seats (11,100 km at 410) | 870 km/h | $70K | $35M | 1040 L | 3.68¢ | 23 / 31 | $171 |
| Boeing 787-9 | 420 | 14,140 km at 290 seats (11,900 km at 420) | 870 km/h | $336K | $150M | 718 L | 2.48¢ | 4 / 31 | $800 |
| Airbus A340-300 | 440 | 13,500 km at 277 seats (11,300 km at 440) | 870 km/h | $80K | $40M | 925 L | 3.05¢ | 20 / 31 | $182 |
| Airbus A330-300 | 440 | 11,750 km at 277 seats (9,200 km at 440) | 870 km/h | $170K | $70M | 794 L | 2.62¢ | 11 / 31 | $386 |
| Airbus A350-900 | 440 | 15,400 km at 325 seats (13,600 km at 440) | 870 km/h | $403K | $185M | 780 L | 2.57¢ | 10 / 31 | $916 |
| Airbus A350-900ULR | 440 | 18,000 km at 161 seats (13,700 km at 440) | 870 km/h | $423K | $195M | 813 L | 2.68¢ | 14 / 31 | $961 |
| Boeing 777-200ER | 440 | 13,080 km at 313 seats (11,200 km at 440) | 870 km/h | $117K | $48M | 854 L | 2.81¢ | 17 / 31 | $266 |
| Boeing 777-200LR | 440 | 15,843 km at 317 seats (14,100 km at 440) | 870 km/h | $152K | $62M | 872 L | 2.87¢ | 18 / 31 | $345 |
| Boeing 787-10 | 440 | 11,730 km at 336 seats (10,000 km at 440) | 870 km/h | $365K | $165M | 756 L | 2.49¢ | 5 / 31 | $830 |
| COMAC C929 | 440 | 12,000 km at 280 seats (9,600 km at 440) | 870 km/h | $293K | $109M | 820 L | 2.70¢ | 15 / 31 | $666 |
| Boeing 777X-8 | 445 | 16,090 km at 395 seats (15,300 km at 445) | 870 km/h | $435K | $180M | 777 L | 2.53¢ | 7 / 31 | $978 |
| Airbus A330-900neo | 460 | 13,334 km at 280 seats (10,200 km at 460) | 870 km/h | $268K | $110M | 723 L | 2.28¢ | 2 / 31 | $583 |
| Airbus A340-600 | 475 | 14,600 km at 380 seats (13,700 km at 475) | 870 km/h | $96K | $48M | 1250 L | 3.82¢ | 24 / 31 | $202 |
| Airbus A350-1000 | 480 | 16,100 km at 380 seats (14,600 km at 480) | 870 km/h | $463K | $210M | 848 L | 2.56¢ | 8 / 31 | $965 |
| Airbus A350-1000ULR | 480 | 18,000 km at 238 seats (14,600 km at 480) | 870 km/h | $486K | $222M | 883 L | 2.67¢ | 13 / 31 | $1,013 |
| Boeing 777-300ER | 550 | 13,650 km at 396 seats (11,600 km at 550) | 870 km/h | $403K | $170M | 951 L | 2.51¢ | 6 / 31 | $733 |
| Boeing 777X-9 | 550 | 13,500 km at 426 seats (11,700 km at 550) | 870 km/h | $520K | $215M | 856 L | 2.26¢ | 1 / 31 | $945 |
Six wide-bodies that pay for themselves
Thirty types are listed above and most of them will quietly bleed you. These six are the ones that reward the effort: one to start with, one to grow into, two that solve a specific problem cheaply, one efficiency leader, and one you should walk straight past however good it looks in the table. Every number below comes from that table or from the game's market screen, which quotes each type's maintenance as delivered.
Boeing 767-300ER — the cheap way into long-haul
Lease this one, and lease it rather than buy it. At $68,000 a week it is the second-cheapest lease of any wide-body that reaches beyond 11,000 kilometres, and its 11,090 kilometres of range covers most transatlantic and plenty of transpacific work. The catch is the bill nobody reads: the 767 arrives ten years old, so maintenance starts at $210,000 a week, more than three times the lease, and your real fixed cost is $278,000 before a single litre of fuel. Your whole $10M starting balance is about thirty-six weeks of that with no revenue at all, which is why the $28M purchase price is not a turn-one conversation.
Its cheaper sibling, the 767-200ER, leases for $40,000 and actually flies further at 12,200 kilometres, but it burns 3.14 cents per seat-kilometre against the -300ER's 2.90 — 8% more — and gives you only 290 seats to spread costs across. Take the -200ER on a genuinely thin pair; take the -300ER when you have a market that fills 300 seats. Either way, 8,500 feet of runway is a mild constraint, and 351 seats at 45% is 158 passengers paying a bill that was written for 351. Get the fare and demand maths right before you sign anything.
Airbus A330-200 — the workhorse you upgrade into
Once your 767 routes are spilling traffic above 80%, this is the replacement. The A330-200 costs $134,000 to lease and, because it arrives six years old, about $171,000 to maintain, so $305,100 fixed — $27,100 a week more than a 767-300ER. That buys 55 extra seats, 2,310 extra kilometres of reach, and 2.66 cents per seat-kilometre against 2.90, roughly 8% less fuel for every seat you move. Put another way: an A330-200 flying at 87% load carries as many people as a 767-300ER filled to the last seat, and it does so on cheaper fuel.
Range of 13,400 kilometres opens nearly every intercontinental pair worth flying, and it needs only 8,100 feet of runway — only the A330-800neo and A350-900 combine more range with a shorter strip, and both lease for $231,000 a week or more. That combination is the quiet reason the -200 outlives flashier jets in most fleets: it can serve secondary airports that lock out the 777s entirely. Buying costs $55M, which is almost exactly 410 weeks of the lease — a ratio broadly similar to most modern types here, so ownership is a cash-flow decision, not a bargain. Lease while you are still opening routes; buy once the network stops changing every few weeks.
Boeing 777-200ER — 440 seats on a bargain lease
Four hundred and forty seats for a $117,000 lease is the cheapest large cabin in the game that does not come with a serious fuel penalty attached. Only three long-range jets of similar size lease for less — the MD-11 at $70,000, the A340-300 at $80,000 and the A340-600 at $96,000 — and they burn 3.68, 3.05 and 3.82 cents per seat-kilometre against the 777's 2.81, which is 31%, 9% and 36% more fuel on every seat you carry. If you have found a fat market and cannot yet fund a neo, this is how you serve it.
Read the maintenance line before you celebrate, though. The 777-200ER arrives six years old, so maintenance starts at $236,000 a week: it exceeds the lease by $119,000 and beats the far newer A330-900neo's $165,000 despite carrying twenty fewer seats, so your true fixed cost is $353,000 — and an ageing airframe means that number climbs while mechanical failures start appearing. It also demands 9,500 feet of runway, which quietly deletes a slice of the airport list. Against the A330-900neo it saves you $80,000 a week fixed but burns 23% more per seat-kilometre, so the verdict swings with the fuel market: cheap fuel favours the 777, and a price drifting towards $2 a litre hands the route back to the Airbus.
Airbus A330-800neo — long, thin and unusually cheap
Range is the one thing the market charges a fortune for, and this is the exception. The A330-800neo reaches 15,100 kilometres on a $231,000 lease and $160,000 of maintenance, while burning 2.46 cents per seat-kilometre — third-lowest of all thirty types. Only four aircraft in the table fly further, and three of them start at $423,000 a week to lease. The fourth, the 777-200LR, leases for less at $152,000, but it arrives six years old, so its maintenance makes it $14,700 a week dearer to hold. It also burns 2.87 cents, 17% more fuel per seat-kilometre, on precisely the ultra-long sectors where fuel dominates everything else — and it needs 9,800 feet of runway against the -800neo's 8,000.
Be honest with yourself about whether you need the reach, because the family comparison is brutal. Its sister, the A330-900neo, gives up 1,766 kilometres and hands you 54 more seats for $37,000 more lease. Fixed cost per seat lands at $963 a week on the -800neo and $941 on the -900neo, near enough identical — so within the family, distance is close to free and seats are what you actually pay for. Use the -800neo where the mission genuinely runs past 13,300 kilometres or where an 8,000-foot runway rules out everything else. Anywhere shorter, you are leasing range you never fly.
Airbus A330-900neo — the efficiency leader worth growing into
Only the 777X-9 moves a seat a kilometre for less than this jet's 2.28 cents, and only by two hundredths. That is 13% below the A330-300 it replaces, 21% below the 767-300ER, and better than every other Boeing in the table. It carries 460 seats, flies 13,334 kilometres, and needs only 8,200 feet of runway, which is a remarkable trio for one airframe. Maintenance is $165,000 — among aircraft of 440 seats or more, only the 787-10 costs less to keep flying.
The barrier is the $268,000 lease, and the honest arithmetic is this: an A330-300 leases for $170,000 but arrives ten years old with $240,000 of maintenance, so the neo costs only $23,000 more per week in fixed cost, and the fuel saving has to cover it. Fuel is burned per aircraft, and the neo saves about $1.03 on every kilometre at base price, which covers the gap at roughly 22,300 km a week — a single long-haul round trip — while carrying twenty more seats. Only on a very light schedule is the A330-300 the smarter lease. Once you have a hub feeding consistent 80%-plus loads, the neo stops being an aspiration and becomes the cheapest way to fly a seat anywhere in the game.
Boeing 777X-9 — the trap almost everyone falls into
Everyone wants this one, and the table is why: 550 seats, 13,500 kilometres, and nothing in the game burns less per seat-kilometre. Then you add the columns up. A $520,000 lease plus $290,000 of maintenance is $810,000 a week before fuel — your entire starting balance covers roughly twelve weeks of it. The maintenance charge alone, $290,000, is nearly what an A330-200 costs in lease and maintenance combined. And that lease equals nearly four A330-200 leases, which is around 1,575 seats spread across four separate markets instead of 550 stacked into one.
The killer figure is fixed cost per passenger. Filled to the very last seat, the 777X-9 carries people at $1,473 each per week; an A330-900neo matches that at 64% load, while also burning less fuel. Worse, the older 777-300ER seats the same 550, flies 150 kilometres further, and costs $686,200 a week fixed — $123,800 less. It burns 11% more per seat, but at about $1.38 a kilometre that only adds up to the fixed-cost gap after roughly 90,000 km a week. So on most schedules the extra spend buys you almost nothing you can bank. It is a fine aeroplane for a mature airline with one enormous market, a 9,800-foot runway at both ends, and cash to spare. Bought early, it is simply the most expensive way to discover your load factor.
Every type in the category
Reference entries for all 31, in the same order as the table. The table above carries seats, range, cruise speed, lease, price and fuel; these add the runway each type needs and its base weekly maintenance bill. That base is for a factory-fresh frame: out-of-production types arrive second-hand, already years old, and their maintenance starts higher (the market screen in the game quotes the delivered figure).
Airbus A310-300
Shorter A300 with transcontinental range. A bargain on thinner long-haul routes.
Airbus A310-200
Shortened A300 with an advanced wing. An efficient medium widebody for its day.
Boeing 767-200ER
Original transatlantic twin. Long range in a smaller widebody package.
Ilyushin Il-96-300
Soviet-era four-engine wide-body. Long range with unique niche in CIS markets.
Airbus A300B4
The world's first twin-engine widebody and the aircraft that launched Airbus.
Ilyushin Il-86
The Soviet Union's first widebody. Thirsty engines kept it on medium-haul routes.
Boeing 767-300ER
Classic wide-body. Cost-effective for medium long-haul routes.
Airbus A300-600R
The original widebody twin. Old tech but extremely cheap on the used market.
Boeing 767-400ER
Stretched 767 with modern winglets. Good capacity for medium long-haul routes.
Douglas DC-10-30
Classic tri-jet from the 1970s. Very low acquisition cost but thirsty.
Boeing 787-8
Dreamliner in compact form. Excellent fuel efficiency for long-haul.
Lockheed L-1011 TriStar
The DC-10's technically superior rival. Rolls-Royce RB.211 engines delivered better fuel economy. Lost the market battle but earned a loyal following for its smooth ride and reliability.
Airbus A330-200
Shorter A330 with excellent long-haul range. Ideal for thinner intercontinental routes.
Airbus A330-800neo
The smaller, ultra-long-range neo. New, efficient engines on the proven A330 airframe.
McDonnell Douglas MD-11
Tri-jet DC-10 successor. Cheap to buy used but higher fuel and maintenance costs.
Boeing 787-9
Sweet-spot Dreamliner. Most popular long-haul aircraft for a reason.
Airbus A340-300
Four-engine long-hauler. ETOPS-free twin-aisle with global reach.
Airbus A330-300
Dependable long-haul twin. Popular on high-demand medium to long routes.
Airbus A350-900
Flagship wide-body. Best fuel economics per seat for ultra-long-haul.
Airbus A350-900ULR
Ultra-long-range A350. Flown with a light premium cabin it reaches 18,000 km; pack it with seats and that range is gone.
Boeing 777-200ER
The original 777. Dominant on international trunk routes for three decades.
Boeing 777-200LR
Worldliner. Flies virtually anywhere nonstop, built for ultra-long-haul.
Boeing 787-10
Stretched 787, great capacity but shorter range. Best for busy medium-haul.
COMAC C929
China's widebody ambition, a 280-seat twin aimed at the 787 and A330neo.
Boeing 777X-8
Ultra-long-range 777X. Connects the world's most distant city pairs.
Airbus A330-900neo
Re-engined A330 with better fuel burn and intercontinental range.
Airbus A340-600
Stretched quad with massive capacity. High fuel burn but very long range.
Airbus A350-1000
Stretched A350. Highest capacity twin-engine aircraft available.
Airbus A350-1000ULR
Qantas' Project Sunrise A350. With a light premium cabin its extra fuel tank takes it Sydney to London nonstop; pack it with seats and that range is gone.
Boeing 777-300ER
The freight train of long-haul. Massive capacity, proven on trunk routes.
Boeing 777X-9
Next-gen 777 with folding wingtips. Massive capacity for ultra-high-demand routes.